Tadepalli police have registered a criminal case against YSRCP key leader Sajjala Ramakrishna Reddy after a complaint was filed by Rajdhani Dalit JAC leader and State SC Corporation Director Kambhampati Sirisha, protesting Sajjala’s comments on Amaravati women.
It is known that journalist Krishnam Raju made extremely objectionable comments on capital Amaravati women that shocked the community. Amaravati women protested against journalist Krishnam Raju’s objectionable comments on them. At that time, Sajjala Ramakrishna Reddy made inappropriate comments on capital Amaravati women again.
Following this, Kambhampati Sirisha filed a complaint against Sajjala Ramakrishna Reddy. The Amaravati women expressed their grief that they were deeply hurt by the comments made by Sakshi TV Channel anchor Kommineni Srinivasa Rao and journalist Krishnam Raju, and that Sajjala’s comments further hurt them.
Amaravati Women questioned the meaning behind former Chief Minister Jaganmohan Reddy and Bharathi Reddy defending those who make dirty comments, who should condemn such comments. While women farmers in Thullur filed a complaint against Sajjala Ramakrishna Reddy and Sakshi’s ownership, State SC Corporation Director Sirisha filed a complaint with the police in Tadepalli.
The Tadepalli police have registered a criminal case against Sajjala. Further action is being considered. Presently, in the process of registering a criminal case against Sajjala Ramakrishna Reddy, there is a possibility of giving him a notice to appear for questioning in two to three days.
Many are also expressing the opinion that there is a possibility of taking key steps after the investigation. On the other hand, Sajjala Ramakrishna Reddy approached the AP High Court to provide protection from arrest in this case. But, the bench dismissed this petition.
To this extent, the police have filed a case against him under various sections. Tadepalli SI Khajavali is investigating the case. Advocate VV Lakshminarayana filed an implied petition in the High Court on behalf of Sirisha, stating that anticipatory bail cannot be granted to Sajja.
