AIMIM supremo and Hyderabad MP Asaduddin Owaisi, who was close ally of the BRS till recently, has threatened that party their horoscope is with him, if he opens his mouth they will be landed in trouble.
Owaisi, who is now sailing with the Congress, questioned BRS strong opposition to Revanth Reddy’s Musi river project and asked whether during their regime they did not try for Musi renovation? He also reminded them that it was he who opposed their plan.
Asked whether he should reveal all the things from that time now, Asaduddin warned that BRS leaders would be in trouble if he opened his mouth. However, he made it clear that he would welcome it if Musi cleansing was carried out without moving houses. He advised BRS leadership that its policies should be consistent.
Asaduddin said that the BRS party got more seats in the GHMC elections because of them. Referring to the defeat of BRS in last year’s assembly elections, he felt that BRS would have won again in this assembly election too if 24 candidates had been changed. But, he accused that it was due to arrogance of the leadership BRS was defeated in the polls.
On the other hand, MIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi recently questioning Revanth Reddy’s Hydra demolition drive, asked whether government buildings within the FTL and buffer zone of Hussain Sagar in the city will be demolished? He also questioned whether the Baldia building was built within the FTL and whether it will be demolished as well? He questioned whether Necklace Road also falls within the FTL and whether it will be demolished?
Meanwhile, referring to recent comments of Chandrababu Naidu and MK Stalin asking people to have more children, Owaisi said if he had said the same thing, that would have created a big uproar. He said that Chandrababu has realized that the birth rate rate in South India is low.
He said that if the re-division of constituencies is done according to population, the southern states will suffer. He said that the number of Assembly and Lok Sabha seats will decrease. He wondered, “What is the benefit of punishing the states that have done well without encouraging them”?
